Editor's note:
Every month in the Ottawa Construction News, I write a column called The Publisher's Viewpoint about current issues that are pertinent to the industry. What follows is this month's column mostly as it will appear when it comes off the presses this week, with a few more points and links added in here and there. A PDF of the May issue is also embedded at the end of this post for your reference.
This month's column was on the phenomenon of "Greenwashing." Our company President Mark Buckshon has also recently written about this issue on his blog - you can read his thoughts here...but be sure to come back! ]
----
Readers of the Ottawa Construction News have heard a lot of talk in our pages recently about Green building, LEED building and sustainable design. In fact, in the soon-to-be-delivered May issue, they will see a feature profile of the new EcoCite LEED condo development on the canal by Taplen Construction and Christopher Simmonds Architect. (You can view a PDF of the Special Feature here.) At the OCN, we like to bring attention to these types of projects, and to green issues in general because we believe they are important to consider for the future of our industry.
But anytime there is a paradigm shift within an industry, like the one we are seeing now toward Green building practices, there are likely to be two camps: Those who truly believe in the new paradigm and whose body of work clearly shows it (like Taplen, Simmonds and others), and the hangers-on who merely try to 'hop on the bandwagon' without really changing the way they do business. (Here we won't name names.)
The latter camp is so common, unfortunately, that there has already been a term coined to describe those who try to make business-as-usual look 'trendy' and environmentally friendly: Greenwashers. It's a portmanteau of "green" and "whitewashing", and it means exactly what you would expect.
So what is Greenwashing and how can you avoid it in your own business, and in your own marketing? Well, I heard an excellent example of this phenomenon on the radio the other day and although it is from outside our industry, it does illustrate the point really well.
I won't name the company here, but a retail store was running a spot recently to promote their new environmentally friendly line of beauty and personal care products. "Come on in and buy from our new lineup of EnviroCare products," the ad beckoned, "and you will be entered to win in our grand prize draw with each purchase." (I've changed the name of the product line for the sake of anonymity.)
'So, what is the problem with this promo?,' you might ask. And in truth, nothing is really wrong with it on the surface - selling environmentally friendly products is a great idea.
But then the radio announcer goes on to explain that the "Grand Prize Draw" would be for... return airfare for a trip for two across Canada!
Now, let's just do a quick number crunch on that carbon tradeoff, shall we?
According to CarbonFootprint.com's online calculator, that grand prize flight to Whistler from anywhere in Canada could emit up to 2 tonnes of CO2 equivalents for two passengers, the equivalent of cutting down and burning two rain forest trees that are 40 feet tall and a foot in diametre!
I would like to hear the non-Greenwashed version of that radio spot. "With every purchase of our environmentally friendly shampoo, you will be entered into a draw to win our grand prize - the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for you and a friend to chop down two giant rainforest trees!"
At the end of the day, this just seems to me like a case of really poorly thought-out marketing, because to an environmentally-conscious consumer (like myself), the obvious carbon footprint of that 'grand prize' sticks out like a sore thumb and just doesn't jive with the Green image they are trying to portray. Whether it was intentional or not, this company ended up sounding like they didn't really care about their effect on the environment, they just wanted to sound like they did.
So you may be asking, how does this relate to the construction industry, and what can you learn from this example? I think the lesson to be learned here is that if you choose to go about making your business greener, you need to be genuine in those efforts, and truthful in whatever marketing you do.
And it's important to mention here that you do have a choice. While I firmly believe that to remain relevant, construction companies are going to have to be environmentally conscious, you may disagree with me and that's your right. But if you do choose to dismiss Green building as a 'fad', and go about business as usual, don't pretend otherwise because your efforts to do so will be in vain.
At the Greater Ottawa Home Builder's Association's Hello Goodbye breakfast earlier this year, Bernard Hudon presented research showing that today's homebuyers are highly educated individuals who research purchases extensively and care about environmental factors. These buyers will see through a Greenwash-smokescreen.
And in the commercial building sector, the situation is no different. The biggest commissioners of buildings care more now than ever for the environmental impact of their projects, both for the effect they will have on their public image, and for the long-term cashflow savings that ecologically sound builds can provide.
A perfect example is the City of Ottawa, which recently mandated that all its new buildings 5,400 square feet or larger must be LEED certified at minimum, even expansion projects like the Goulbourn Rec centre one we profiled in the OCN in February. (The PDF is here.) These owners will not be fooled either by slick marketing that is less than truthful.
Applying for LEED and following that spec is a great idea for larger builds - nothing will convey credibility as well as an endorsement of your ecological efforts by the Canada Green Building Council. Marketing guru Seth Godin (whose blog I love) wrote an interesting entry recently where he argued that to truly market themselves as 'green' with any credibility, businesses will soon need some way to truly quantify their green-ness. As builders, LEED's points system can certainly do the trick.
Having said that, I know LEED can be expensive if your capital budget is thin, and I know its standards are simply unworkable in some circumstances (ie: rural applications.)
However, even if you can't build to LEED spec, and get that certification, you can still take steps to make your builds greener and let your clients know about your efforts in your marketing, without being guilty of Greenwashing.
Buy materials from vendors who are committed to sustainable development, like local firm The Healthiest Home and Building Supplies, or others around the city. For the record, using leftover drywall from a previous project is not "Using recycled materials"!
If it's a home you're building, make it easy for the eventual owner to make it as energy efficient as possible by participating in programs and building philosophies like EnergyStar, SolarReady and High Performance Homes. Check out St. Thomas, Ontario-based home builder Doug Tarry Homes for a great example of how leveraging those two programs can lead to great success. (We also featured Tarry in the most recent issue of the GTA Construction Report, the PDF is here.)
If yours is a larger development, why not replant some of the trees you tore down to build elsewhere? As a publishing company, we proudly put our money where our mouth by partnering with Tree Canada, which plants a tree for each one of our advertisers in every issue, so that the net effect of printing all our papers is a surplus of trees!
There are many other online resources that can guide you in the right direction:
- This site by the American organization NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council), outlines "Building Green from Principle to Practice," and aims show how building green can boost your bottom line.
- This blog is interesting - it is the personal account of a newlywed couple in Calgary who sought to build a truly eco-friendly custom home. You can follow the process from early 2006 to present and pick up some ideas along the way.
- Whatsworking.com includes a long list of resources on green building and sustainable development.
- The CaGBC's own site includes some information on how you can build more environmentally friendly projects, even if you can't afford LEED. If you live near Toronto, you could also plan to attend Shifting the Mainstream - the CaGBC Summit on June 11-12, featuring keynote speaker David Suzuki. We are an official media sponsor for the event, and it looks like there are many useful seminars and talks planned for the two-day conference.
There are many, many things you can do to respect the environment when you build, and my recommendation is to do as many of them as possible, and to be honest about it in your advertising.
Because you're either making a difference, or you're faking it. And when people think you're faking it, that's worse than if they think you just don't care.
---
Here is the PDF of the May issue (click to see larger):
No comments:
Post a Comment